Book 1 - FINAL FULL PAPER

← Go back

Abstract IDABSTRACT-3d63
Status – REVIEWER 1Pending review
Reviewed – Reviewer 1THIS PAPER IS REVIEWED
PENDING REVIEW – Reviewer 1THIS PAPER IS PENDING REVIEW
REVIEWER 1
Is this the right topic for this paper?*Yes
What type of presentation would you consider most appropiate for this work?*Poster
Global valuation of the paper *
012345678910
Originality of contribution
Innovation
Breadth of applicability
Problem difficulty
Potential for replication by others
Scientific quality of the papers
Quality of written and visual aspects
Relevance to islands (if applicable)
Valuation note – Reviewer 1The quality of the poster/oral presentation will be evaluated during the conference by a comittee.
I would recommend this paper to be published in an associated journal
Please select your final recommendation for this paper *Rejected
Comments for the authors (shown to authors)

This paper presents a very preliminary stage within a research project. There are many expressions like “probably”, “likely”, “possibility”, “is supposed to”, with lack of hypotheses and explanations. The research problem is not stated. Both the title and abstract misrepresent the results indicated in the problem. It is not clear if the objective of the research is a new mathematical model, or the validation of such model, or to optimize Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell operational conditions. Methodology is missing. Discussion beyond mere description is missing as well. The quality of written and visual aspects also indicates a very early stage developing the firrst draft of a paper. Figures´captions are unclear. Methane-water ratios are not explained adequately. Regarding the model, why are not all experiments suitable for modelling comparison?
In summary, this promising research requires more time and further conceptualization to settle as a research output.

Do you want to send your review? *Yes
SEND REVIEW – REVIEWER 1PLEASE, PRESS SAVE CHANGES TO SEND YOUR REVIEW DEFINITIVELY
Status – REVIEWER 2Pending review
Reviewed – Reviewer 2THIS PAPER IS REVIEWED
PENDING REVIEW – Reviewer 2THIS PAPER IS PENDING REVIEW
REVIEWER 2
What type of presentation would you consider most appropiate for this work?*Poster
Global valuation of the paper*
012345678910
Originality of contribution
Innovation
Breadth of applicability
Problem difficulty
Potential for replication by others
Scientific quality of the papers
Quality of written and visual aspects
Relevance to islands (if applicable)
Valuation note – Reviewer 2The quality of the poster/oral presentation will be evaluated during the conference by a comittee.
Please select your final recommendation for this paper*Accepted
Comments for the authors (shown to authors)

this paper is in a very early stage, n ot ready for an oral presentation. Perhaps you want to present it as a poster…

Do you want to send your review?*Yes
SEND REVIEW – REVIEWER 2PLEASE, PRESS SAVE CHANGES TO SEND YOUR REVIEW DEFINITIVELY
SECCIÓN DE GESTIÓN
Corrector 1
  • David Vega Maza
Corrector 2
  • Noemí Melián-Martel
StatusAccepted with changes
Type of Presentation – Final decisionPoster
RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS
Upload your Response (only in PDF format)Responses-to-reviews.pdf


CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NameLukasz
SurnameSzablowski
Telephone+48222341544
EmailEmail hidden; Javascript is required.
AffiliationInstitute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
CountryPoland
CityWarsaw


OTHER AUTHORS’ DATA
Does the abstract accounts with other authors?Yes
Please indicate the number of co-authors5
Co-author 1
Name (Co-author 1)Malgorzata Wojcik
Telephone (Co-author 1)+48222341544
Email (Co-author 1)Email hidden; Javascript is required.
Affiliation (Co-author 1)Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
City (Co-author 1)Warsaw
Country (Co-author 1)Poland
Co-author 2
Name (Co-author 2)Olaf Dybinski
Telephone (Co-author 2)+48222345207
Email (Co-author 2)Email hidden; Javascript is required.
City (Co-author 2)Warsaw
Country (Co-author 2)Poland
Affiliation (Co-author 2)Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
Co-author 3
Name (Co-author 3)Arkadiusz Szczesniak
Telephone (Co-author 3)+48222345207
Email (Co-author 3)Email hidden; Javascript is required.
City (Co-author 3)Warsaw
Country (Co-author 3)Poland
Affiliation (Co-author 3)Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
Co-author 4
Name (Co-author 4)Aliaksandr Martsinchyk
Telephone (Co-author 4)+48222345207
Email (Co-author 4)Email hidden; Javascript is required.
City (Co-author 4)Warsaw
Country (Co-author 4)Poland
Affiliation (Co-author 4)Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
Co-author 5
Name (Co-author 5)Jaroslaw Milewski
Telephone (Co-author 5)+48222345207
Email (Co-author 5)Email hidden; Javascript is required.
City (Co-author 5)Warsaw
Country (Co-author 5)Poland
Affiliation (Co-author 5)Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10


PRESENTERPlease, indicate who among the authors of the article will be the presenter. Please note that at least the presenter should register at the conference. Papers without a registered author by May 30 will not be included in the book of proceedings.
The presenter will be the corresponding author:Yes
FULL PAPER INFORMATION
TitleThe influence of temperature on internal steam methane reforming in molten carbonate fuel cell
TopicG. Fuels, combustion & gasification. Fuel cells. Hydrogen use in energy systems.
Preferred type of presentation. (The organizing committee may change the type of presentation, at the request of the reviewers)Oral Presentation
Keywordsinfluence of temperature, internal reforming, kinetic model, mathematical modeling, molten carbonate fuel cell, nickel catalyst, steam methane reforming


ABSTRACT
Abstract – (Max. 250 words)

The article presents the possibility of fueling a molten carbonate fuel cell with a mixture of methane and steam to perform internal steam methane reforming on anode of the fuel cell. Due to the fact that the optimal operating temperature of MCFC fuel cell is 650°C and the steam reforming process of methane using pure nickel (anode material) as a catalyst takes place at higher temperatures, it seems interesting to test the fuel cell and the reforming process in a non-optimal temperature ranges. The aim of the study is to determine the temperature at which it will be possible to operate of MCFC fuel cell and to carry out the steam reforming of methane. The tested temperature range was from 650°C to 750°C. Testing higher temperatures was not possible due to the limitations associated with the laboratory stand.

The article also presents a mathematical model of a molten carbonate fuel cell operation and a model of the steam reforming process of methane taking place at the anode of this cell. A reduced order model was used to describe molten carbonate fuel cell operation and kinetic model for methane steam reforming.

PUBLICATION OPTIONS
HTML BlockAfter the conference, selected papers (by the reviewers) will be recommended for possible publication in special issues of some scientific journals (https://ecos2023.com/journal-publication). Note that they have to be reviewed based on journal regulations.
All registered and presented papers will be published in a Book of Proceedings. For this issue, two options are possible:
A. Book 1: Book of Proceedings with ISBN, but just as a pdf file, which will be made available to participants at the Conference. With option A your work will not be accessible on-line.
B. Book 2: Online Book of Proceedings, with the possibility of being indexed in SCOPUS, where each paper will have a doi.
We choose:Book 1
FULL PAPER
Upload file (only in PDF format)ECOS2023-Szablowski-et-al.pdf
FINAL PAPER
Upload your Final Paper (only in PDF format)ECOS2023-Szablowski-et-al-Rev1.pdf